Websluthes radio JBR special

[smurf]

Hi all, 12/26/11 there will be a JBR special episode of WS radio.

Link: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/websleuths

Happy litsening.

[FairM]

Originally Posted by smurf

Hi all, 12/26/11 there will be a JBR special episode of WS radio.

Link: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/websleuths

Happy litsening.

thanks for the info, will it be a repeat of the summer show or is this a different one , if so who is on it please?

[Amanda]

Is there anyone that could record this for me? Or know where I can find it to listen to on the internet after the 26th?

[smurf]

FairM, its different to the summer one, as yet i don't know who is on but i'm sure Tricia will let us know.

Amanda i always listen to it the next day as im in the UK and given the time difference its on too late on the actual day, you should be able to find the show on the link i posted after the show has aired. If not i will post a link to where you can hear it then.

[Amanda]

Thanks, Smurf. I'm from the UK too.

[smurf]

so is fairM, it's interesting to see just how far around the world this case got.

[Scorpion]

Originally Posted by smurf

so is fairM, it's interesting to see just how far around the world this case got.

I'm also in the UK.

[status quo]

Websleuths knows nothing of what happened specifically other than what we all know...that it was tragic, happened inside a house on Christmas night, and victimized a small child. It will be therefore trite and boring to see how scant information is extrapolated and unknowns are presented as knowns in order to once again implicate possibly innocent people. That is the mindset at websleuths, to fully exclude intruder possibility despite the contravening evidence.

A one-sided radio show held in the name of the victim is pathetic and a waste of time. Propaganda at best.

[FairM]

Thats the problem it's so one sided over there.

[smurf]

i see your point spin, but it keeps the case in the spotlight which can't be bad either way.

[Inspector Rex]

Originally Posted by status quo

Websleuths knows nothing of what happened specifically other than what we all know...that it was tragic, happened inside a house on Christmas night, and victimized a small child. It will be therefore trite and boring to see how scant information is extrapolated and unknowns are presented as knowns in order to once again implicate possibly innocent people. That is the mindset at websleuths, to fully exclude intruder possibility despite the contravening evidence.

A one-sided radio show held in the name of the victim is pathetic and a waste of time. Propaganda at best.

I agree with all you have said.

However, despite their absolute conviction that RDI is the ONLY answer, by listening to the previous radio program it became obvious that there are as many RDI theories as there are RDI.

No different to IDI, excepting in their case, and according to their theory, there are only three possible perps.
So, each RDI 'expert' proposes a theory that eliminates the theory of at least half the RDI.

It's jolly funny!!

And, while trying their hardest to implicate a Ramsey, they serve to provide evidence which helps to confirm IDI.
My only question is WHICH IDI??

[Inspector Rex]

Originally Posted by FairM

Thats the problem it's so one sided over there.

That is by design FairM.

All the IDI that have posed any 'threat' to their theory have been 'eliminated' in one way or another.
Just look through the threads at all the 'Banned' and 'Inactive' members.
The vast majority were IDI.

Where as, on this forum, the vast majority of RDI remain silent.
When SD comes back from his vacation, some of them poke up their heads.
As soon as SD is challenged to prove his theory, he finds something else that urgently needs his attention LOL.

[Roy23]

Originally Posted by FairM

Thats the problem it's so one sided over there.

I listened to some of the show. The tone is wrong from the very start. It is like no one really wants to have an honest discussion. Of course, the discussion of DNA was most important to me. It was amazing how they just blow it off. I want to know why and how the DNA is in Codis but is unreliable and degraded. Why? How?

[Inspector Rex]

Originally Posted by Roy23

I listened to some of the show. The tone is wrong from the very start. It is like no one really wants to have an honest discussion. Of course, the discussion of DNA was most important to me. It was amazing how they just blow it off. I want to know why and how the DNA is in Codis but is unreliable and degraded. Why? How?

I started to listen, but when I heard the "World Famous Body Language Expert" say that "Patsy wrote (um allegedly wrote) the Ransom Note", then I didn't bother to listen further.

Yes, an allegedly World Famous Body Language Expert's opinion that Patsy looked 'nervous' in the early interviews, aces foreign DNA found on the vicim's clothing every time LOL.

[Roy23]

Originally Posted by Inspector Rex

I started to listen, but when I heard the "World Famous Body Language Expert" say that "Patsy wrote (um allegedly wrote) the Ransom Note", then I didn't bother to listen further.

Yes, an allegedly World Famous Body Language Expert's opinion that Patsy looked 'nervous' in the early interviews, aces foreign DNA found on the vicim's clothing every time LOL.

They hint at a huge development for the year 2012. I can only assume it has
RDI all over it. I will certainly eat my share of humble pie if that is true. But I doubt it.