Jackson’s ex says he didn’t father kids

[Royalpurple209]

Report: Jackson’s ex says he didn’t father kids

Nov. 30, 2005

The mother of two of Michael Jackson’s children has reportedly said that the babies were conceived from a test tube.

An Irish publication is quoting Debbie Rowe as saying that Prince Michael Jr., 8, and Paris, 7, were both conceived using semen from a sperm bank.

“Michael knows the truth — that he is not the natural father of Prince Michael Jr. and Paris,” Rowe said, according to the Irish newspaper Sunday World. “He has to come clean.”

The alleged comments come on the heels of a report in the New York Daily News that Jackson has been limiting Rowe’s access to their children.

Rowe couldn’t be reached for further comment and Jackson’s rep didn’t respond to repeated requests for comment.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9916524/

[Asphodel]

With that voice of his, you wouldn't think he'd have the balls to do it.

[magpie]

With that voice of his, you wouldn't think he'd have the balls to do it.

LOL, very funny!

This doesn't surprise me. Even through those dumb veils he makes the kids wear, you can see that the kids are very pale in complexion. Michael Jackson's skin would normally be very dark, were it not for the skin bleaching or whatever is the cause of his paleness. Some say it's a skin disorder, whatever.

[Asphodel]

Yeah... Even with the veils you can tell they're white. Those kids are going to end up so crazy.

[Stuckinahs]

If it's true that sperm from a sperm bank was used, what kind of person is Debbie Rowe to sell her children to that nut-bag? And if he's not the biological father, why can't she get them back? We know that the court takes adopted children away from the adoptive parents all the time. If it was some guy making minimum wage who had two children who were not his biological children, you know the court would have taken them away after the first accusation of child molestation. But of course, it's Michael Jackson...

[Pook]

http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercu...s/13891073.htm

Jackson's children still in middle of custody fight

Michael Jackson's legal fight with ex-wife Deborah Rowe over their two children -- otherwise known as the Custody Battle of the Damned -- is heating up, thanks to Rowe's latest victory.

The California 2nd District Court of Appeals in Los Angeles ruled Wednesday that in her previous custody case, Rowe's parental rights were not properly relinquished under the law. The ruling sets the stage for more legal sparring between the onetime King of Pop and his former incubator, er, wife.

The appeals court ruled that while Rowe gave up her parental rights in 2001 and conceded sole custody of the two kids to Jackson, the case was marred because the judge in the case neglected to have state officials determine what was in the kids' best interests. Presumably, these officials would have suggested that anything up to and including being raised by glue-sniffing badgers would be preferable to the freakish Voyage of Dysfunction to which the kids have been consigned.

The judge, Steven M. Lachs, agreed he had been in error and voided his own ruling in 2004. The appeals court's ruling this week upholds Lachs' decision and puts the custody fight back in play.

What Jackson's next move will be was not known Thursday. He had no immediate comment on the ruling, publicist Raymone K. Bain said. The entertainer has been living out of the country since his acquittal on molestation charges last June, and is reportedly traveling with his children in Italy.

Jackson and Rowe married in November 1996 and filed for divorce in October 1999 after the births of son Prince Michael and a daughter, Paris. Jackson also has a son whose mother hasn't been identified.

At a hearing on Jackson's motion opposing Rowe's move to regain parental rights, Lachs was quoted as saying, "It was an arranged deal from the beginning. ... This was not Mom and Dad saying, 'Hey, let's have a family that we're going to raise.'"

[Asphodel]

The ruling sets the stage for more legal sparring between the onetime King of Pop and his former incubator, er, wife.

LOL!

[TruthIsStranger]

Michael Jackson is creepy. Just plain creepy.

[crimeshot1]

I completely agree. I think we've determined that those unfortunate children he claims are his, decided on their own to wear those veils, to avoid being seen with a creepo like Whacko Jacko.

if the kids arent his then we need to prove it by having m.j. take a pertenity test and have it on the media, everything else is why not this? also if they arent his kids then why cant she get them back from him?(not unless he's paying people not to investigate, rich sick people do pay others not to talk.)

[ravenblackwolf]

Originally Posted by Stuckinahs

If it's true that sperm from a sperm bank was used, what kind of person is Debbie Rowe to sell her children to that nut-bag? And if he's not the biological father, why can't she get them back? We know that the court takes adopted children away from the adoptive parents all the time. If it was some guy making minimum wage who had two children who were not his biological children, you know the court would have taken them away after the first accusation of child molestation. But of course, it's Michael Jackson...

flash enough green and have a big name and you can have anything you whant.